February 2004

Inhouse Home Page Inhouse Library Inhouse Archives Search This Site

In this edition:

1. Legislative News
    More FSR regulations
2. Regulator News
    ASIC | ASX | SFE
3. Articles
    Banking and Finance
    Corporations
    Employee Relations
    Intellectual Property
    International Trade
    Privacy
    Taxation
4. Cases
    Corporations - insider trading
    Defamation - defence of qualified privilege
    Trade Practices - meaning of loss or damage
    Trusts - power of court to amend trust deed

Note: All hyperlinks below were correct at the time of publication. Generally, it is too onerous a task for us to check and update these and so if a hyperlink is no longer valid, please accept our apologies.


1. Legislative News

More FSR regulations

Two more sets of FSR Regulations have been promulgated - the Corporations Amendment Regulations 2004 (No 2) SR 25/2004 and the Corporations Amendment Regulations 2004 (No 3) SR 26/2004. For a copy of the regulations and their explanatory statements, go to:

http://scaleplus.law.gov.au/html/numrul/20/10053/0/NL000060.htm

http://scaleplus.law.gov.au/html/ess/0/2004/N/20040226025.htm

http://scaleplus.law.gov.au/html/numrul/20/10054/top.htm

http://scaleplus.law.gov.au/html/ess/0/2004/N/20040226026.htm


2. Regulator News

ASIC - policy - non-cash payment facilities

ASIC has outlined the interim licensing and disclosure relief it is willing to consider for loyalty or reward schemes that constitute or include a non-cash payment facility and for low value non-cash payment facilities that are conducted on a small scale or for a limited purpose and are not part of another financial product. See Information Releases IR 04-06 and IR 04-07:

http://www.asic.gov.au/asic/asic_pub.nsf/byid/10289369A1B49BABCA256E440016FF99?opendocument

http://www.asic.gov.au/asic/asic_pub.nsf/byid/B25CF1B37ACA3FFACA256E440019715E?opendocument

ASIC - guidance - wholesale foreign financial services providers seeking licensing relief

ASIC has issued some practical guidance for wholesale foreign financial services providers seeking to rely on relief from the requirement to hold an Australian financial services licence under the various class orders issued in December 2003. See Information Release IR 04-04:

http://www.asic.gov.au/asic/ASIC_PUB.NSF/byid/84671A1E29506BE2CA256E3D00781556?opendocument

ASIC - policy - citing licence numbers on PDS documentation

ASIC has announced transitional relief for Australian financial services licensees from the obligation under section 912F of the Corporations Act to cite their AFS licence numbers on Product Disclosure Statements. The extension applies to stocks of PDSs, supplementary PDSs and associated application forms that have been printed and are available for distribution before the date on which the licensee was granted its AFSL, where this date is before 11 March 2004. See Information Release IR 04-03:

http://www.asic.gov.au/asic/asic_pub.nsf/byid/5BE5AA7A24DBA69BCA256E3D001EA999?opendocument

ASX - rules - new market rules for FSR commencement

ASX has adopted new ASX Market Rules, ACH Clearing Rules and ASTC Settlement Rules to come into operation on 11 March 2004 (subject to Ministerial non-disallowance). For details, see Participant Circular 064/04:

https://www.asxonline.com/intradoc-cgi/idc_cgi_isapi.dll/064c_04.pdf?IdcService=GET_FILE&dID=8673&dDocName=ASX011786&allowInterrupt=1&viewInline=1&Rendition=Web

To access the new rules, go to:

https://www.asxonline.com/participants/CSSR_FSR/NewDraftRules.htm

SFE - rules - new operating rules for FSR commencement

SFE has adopted new Operating Rules that will come into operation on 11 March 2004. It has also released a new volume of Procedures, Determinations and Practice Notes. For details, see SFE Bulletin 09/04:

http://www.sfe.com.au/Content/bulletins/sfe/2004/sfe2004_009.pdf

To access the new rules and procedures, go to:

http://www.sfe.com.au/content/aboutsfe/sfe_rules/sfe_operatingrules.pdf

http://www.sfe.com.au/content/aboutsfe/sfe_rules/procedures_determinations.pdf

SFE - procedures - divulging order information following removal of pre-trade mnemonics

Following the removal of pre-trade mnemonics, SFE has published a warning that under no circumstances should participants disseminate any information relating to the identity of a participant working a SYCOM order where that particular order has not been executed in the market. In addition, participants should not attempt to take advantage of the absence of pre-trade mnemonics to make claims regarding activity in the market that is deliberately false (eg falsely claiming to have participated in trades or to having orders in the market). See SFE Bulletin 07/04:

http://www.sfe.com.au/Content/bulletins/sfe/2004/sfe2004_007.pdf


3. Articles

Banking and Finance

The Supreme Court of New South Wales has upheld the operation of the flawed asset provision in the ISDA Master agreement, holding that the court did not have the power to rewrite it in the liquidation of a counterparty. See Mallesons, Financial Services Law Alert - 24 February 2004:

http://www.mallesons.com/publications/alerts/Financial_Services_Alerts/Financial_Services_Law_Alert_24_February_2004.pdf

Corporations

Off-market share buy-backs have become a popular mechanism for managing a company's capital and returns for shareholders. For a short overview of the off-market tender process and the various features of an off-market buy-back, see Mallesons, Mergers and Acquisitions Alert - February 2004:

http://www.mallesons.com/publications/alerts/Mergers_and_Acquisitions_Alert_February_2004.pdf

Employee Relations

A recent decision handed down in the Western Australian Industrial Relations Commission may have significant implications nationally for liquidators, receivers and administrators. The decision opens the door to the possibility that more than one entity is an employer (ie joint employment). This raises a number of questions if a company goes into liquidation, including: who is responsible for the employees’ entitlements; and who is entitled to control employees’ work or terminate their employment? It also sets out a number of factors to be taken into account when determining who the employer is. See Hunt & Hunt, Legal Update: Who’s the Boss? – Joint Employment:

http://www.deacons.com.au/news/article.asp?nID=529

For a paper on the impact that various Australian tax issues may have on the design and operation of employee share and option plans, see Allens Arthur Robinson, Using Employee Share/Option Plans to Attract and Retain Employees – Tax Issues:

http://www.aar.com.au/pubs/pdf/tax/tax17feb04.pdf

And for a discussion of the payroll tax and stamp duty ramifications of employee share schemes, see Allens Arthur Robinson, Employee Shares and Options:

http://www.aar.com.au/pubs/pdf/tax/taxfeb04.pdf

Intellectual Property

For a summary of the key impacts of the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement for intellectual property owners, see Mallesons, Intellectual Property Alert - February 2004:

http://www.mallesons.com/publications/alerts/Intellectual_Property_Alert_February_2004.pdf?CFID=604&CFTOKEN=62561432

International Trade

For general overviews of the key aspects of the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement, see Allens Arthur Robinson, Focus: Free Trade Agreement – February 2004 and Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Free Trade Agreement - 13 February 2004:

http://www.aar.com.au/pubs/ip/foftafeb04.htm

http://www.corrs.com.au/WebStreamer?page_id=4705

Privacy

As part of the Attorney General's review of the Privacy Act, a discussion paper has been released on the employee exemption. See Minter Ellison, Discussion Paper on the Employee Exemption Released - 16 February 2004:

http://www.minterellison.com/ajpe/resources/file/eb00100c1b00055/DiscussionPaperonEmployeeExemption.pdf

Taxation

The Commissioner of Taxation has sent letters to 1500 chairpersons of major Australian listed companies to reinforce the message that boards should become more involved in the tax aspects of major transactions. See Freehills, Michael Carmody's Letter to 1500 Chairs - 13 February 2004:

http://www.freehills.com.au/CA256AD900137BAA/page/Listing-at-Michael+Carmody%27s+letter+to+1500+Chairs001F1156?opendocument&1=50-Publications~&2=0-Taxation+~&3=~&REFUNID=FDF26862489446EA4A256B48001B60A3~undefined


4. Cases

Corporations - insider trading

For those interested in reading the appeal court decision in R v Rivkin [2004] NSWCCA 7, it is available online at:

http://cclsr.law.unimelb.edu.au/judgments/states/nsw/2004/february/2004nswcca7.htm

Defamation - defence of qualified privilege

In Bashford v Information Australia (Newsletters) Pty Limited [2004] HCA 5, a majority of the High Court held that the common law defence of qualified privilege was available in respect of a report of judicial proceedings published in a subscription publication concerning occupational health and safety, notwithstanding that it was published for reward and notwithstanding that the defence of fair and accurate report of judicial proceedings was not available (because the report was inaccurate). The judgment is available online at:

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2004/5.html

Trade Practices - meaning of 'loss or damage'

Murphy v Overton Investments Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 3 contains an exposition by the High Court of the meaning of "loss or damage" for the purposes of sections 82 and 87 of the Trade Practices Act. The judgment is available online at:

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2004/3.html

Trusts - power of court to amend trust deed

In Arakella v Paton [2004] NSWSC 13, the NSW Supreme Court held that section 81 of Trustee Act (NSW) empowers the court to amend a trading trust instrument and confer on the trustee a power of amendment affecting rights of beneficiaries. It also held that such an amendment would not offend the Gambotto principles. The judgment is available online at:

http://cclsr.law.unimelb.edu.au/judgments/states/nsw/2004/january/2004nswsc13.htm


Copyright © 2004 Inhouse Legal Solutions Pty Limited ("ILS") ABN 16 003 663 456.

This newsletter is a summary only of the subject matter covered and is not intended to be, nor should it be relied upon as, a substitute for legal or other professional advice. It is made available without the assumption of a duty of care by ILS, or the officers, employees or agents of ILS who were involved in its preparation and without any representation or warranty as to accuracy or completeness. ILS is not responsible for, and gives no representations or warranties regarding, the source, quality, accuracy or completeness of the materials on any web site to which a hyperlink is provided above.